The following statement was issued by the US National Grain and Feed Association (NGFA) and the North American Export Grain Association (NAEGA) earlier today in response to rejections of US corn and distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGs) by Chinese authorities because of the presence of Syngenta’s Agrisure Viptera® biotechnology-enhanced corn and Syngenta’s recent commercialization this year of its Agrisure Duracade® biotechnology-enhanced corn, which also has not been approved yet by China and other US export markets.
Associations call for an immediate halt to commercialisation of biotech corn
The statement reads:
“On January 22, 2014 our Associations sent a letter to Syngenta asking the company to immediately halt commercialization in the United States of its Agrisure Viptera® corn and Agrisure Duracade® corn until such time as China and certain other US export markets have granted required regulatory approvals/authorisations.
“The NGFA and NAEGA both strongly support agricultural biotechnology and other scientific and technological innovations that contribute to production efficiency and availability of a safe, abundant and high-quality food and feed supply for US and world consumers.
“On January 22, 2014 our Associations sent a letter to Syngenta asking the company to immediately halt commercialization in the United States of its Agrisure Viptera® corn and Agrisure Duracade® corn until such time as China and certain other US export markets have granted required regulatory approvals/authorisations.
“The NGFA and NAEGA both strongly support agricultural biotechnology and other scientific and technological innovations that contribute to production efficiency and availability of a safe, abundant and high-quality food and feed supply for US and world consumers.
“However, NAEGA and NGFA are gravely concerned about the serious economic harm to exporters, grain handlers and, ultimately, agricultural producers – as well as the United States’ reputation to meet its customers’ needs – that has resulted from Syngenta’s current approach to stewardship of Viptera. Further, the same concerns now transcend to Syngenta’s intended product launch plans for Duracade, which risk repeating and extending the damage. Immediate action is required by Syngenta to halt such damage.
“There are numerous negative consequences incurred when the Chinese and other US export markets are put at risk through commercialisation of biotechnology-enhanced seeds before approvals for import into foreign markets are obtained. Such consequences may include reducing the value and demand for the US farmers’ products, preventing foreign consumer access to much-needed supplies, shutting off or increasing the cost of US producers’ access to some export markets for their crops, exposing exporting companies to financial losses because of cargo rejections and contract cancellations and ultimately diminishing the United States’ reputation as a reliable, often-preferred supplier of grains, oilseeds and grain products in world markets. Commercialisation prior to foreign regulatory approvals also has a negative impact on the overall US corn and other grain value chains and reduces significantly US agriculture’s contribution to global food security and economic growth.
“Within the US grain and oilseed handling and marketing system, each purchaser or handler makes its own determination as to whether to accept various commodity crops – including those produced from biotechnology-enhanced seeds. Such a decision likely is driven by customer preferences, infrastructure and operational limitations, regulatory regimes and contractual commitments, as well as meeting regulatory requirements in the respective markets they serve. Given the nature of the US grain marketing system, these business decisions extend to the first point of sale or transfer from the producer.
“As a matter of policy, NGFA and NAEGA have communicated consistently, clearly and in good faith with biotechnology providers and seed companies about the importance of biotechnology providers actually obtaining regulatory approvals/authorizations for import in foreign markets before such traits are commercialised in the United States. Individual grain handler, processor, service provider and exporter member companies of our Associations represent further system- wide support and advocacy for this policy.
“US farmers, as well as the commercial grain handling and export industry, depend heavily upon the exercise of due corporate responsibility by biotechnology providers with respect to the timing of product launch and commercialisation. We therefore seek assurances from Syngenta that it will follow suit by publicly announcing that it will suspend immediately its commercialisation of Viptera and Duracade products in the United States until such time as China and other US export markets have granted required regulatory approvals and authorisations.
“Given these on-going concerns, NGFA and NAEGA urge US farmers to evaluate these issues as they prepare for the 2014 planting season. Farmers should check with their local grain elevators and merchants to determine whether the grain buyer or handler has any limitations on accepting biotechnology traits that do not have certain export market approvals.”
Note: More news on this and other issues at NGFA and at NAEGA
“There are numerous negative consequences incurred when the Chinese and other US export markets are put at risk through commercialisation of biotechnology-enhanced seeds before approvals for import into foreign markets are obtained. Such consequences may include reducing the value and demand for the US farmers’ products, preventing foreign consumer access to much-needed supplies, shutting off or increasing the cost of US producers’ access to some export markets for their crops, exposing exporting companies to financial losses because of cargo rejections and contract cancellations and ultimately diminishing the United States’ reputation as a reliable, often-preferred supplier of grains, oilseeds and grain products in world markets. Commercialisation prior to foreign regulatory approvals also has a negative impact on the overall US corn and other grain value chains and reduces significantly US agriculture’s contribution to global food security and economic growth.
“Within the US grain and oilseed handling and marketing system, each purchaser or handler makes its own determination as to whether to accept various commodity crops – including those produced from biotechnology-enhanced seeds. Such a decision likely is driven by customer preferences, infrastructure and operational limitations, regulatory regimes and contractual commitments, as well as meeting regulatory requirements in the respective markets they serve. Given the nature of the US grain marketing system, these business decisions extend to the first point of sale or transfer from the producer.
“As a matter of policy, NGFA and NAEGA have communicated consistently, clearly and in good faith with biotechnology providers and seed companies about the importance of biotechnology providers actually obtaining regulatory approvals/authorizations for import in foreign markets before such traits are commercialised in the United States. Individual grain handler, processor, service provider and exporter member companies of our Associations represent further system- wide support and advocacy for this policy.
“US farmers, as well as the commercial grain handling and export industry, depend heavily upon the exercise of due corporate responsibility by biotechnology providers with respect to the timing of product launch and commercialisation. We therefore seek assurances from Syngenta that it will follow suit by publicly announcing that it will suspend immediately its commercialisation of Viptera and Duracade products in the United States until such time as China and other US export markets have granted required regulatory approvals and authorisations.
“Given these on-going concerns, NGFA and NAEGA urge US farmers to evaluate these issues as they prepare for the 2014 planting season. Farmers should check with their local grain elevators and merchants to determine whether the grain buyer or handler has any limitations on accepting biotechnology traits that do not have certain export market approvals.”
Note: More news on this and other issues at NGFA and at NAEGA
No comments:
Post a Comment